For developers: your first week on an inherited codebase
A calm, day-by-day plan for your first week on someone else's code: secure access, make backups, learn the system, add safety nets, then report in writing.
ReadCursor is an AI-assisted code editor built on the same foundations as Visual Studio Code. Unlike app builders that host your project for you, Cursor works on files in a folder on your computer, so whatever you have built is a regular codebase in whatever language and framework the AI and you chose. That makes Cursor projects some of the most straightforward to hand over, and also some of the most varied.
Because Cursor can produce large amounts of code quickly, a project can grow faster than its structure. Owners often describe the same pattern: the first features came together easily, then each change started breaking something elsewhere, and the AI's suggestions began contradicting earlier decisions. The app may run locally but has never been deployed, or it was deployed once and nobody is sure how to repeat the steps.
Typical contents include a frontend framework such as Next.js, React or Vue, a backend in Node.js or Python, and a database that might be local, hosted or a mix of both. Some projects include .cursor rules files that describe coding conventions, which are useful hints for the next developer.
A helpful habit before handing over is to pause large AI-driven changes for a few days and write down, in your own words, how the main features are meant to behave. The developer can compare that description with what the code really does, and the differences often point straight at the bugs. Short notes work better than a long document; a numbered list of user journeys, such as "visitor signs up, confirms email, creates first project", is usually enough to start.
For the security side, /problems/ai-generated-app-security-issues lists the issues worth checking in any AI-written app.
First, get the code into a private remote repository and confirm that secrets are not committed. Run /tools/repo-health-check and /tools/secret-leak-scanner so you know what a developer will see when they open it. Then write a listing that covers:
Being honest that the code was written mostly with AI help is useful; developers who enjoy this kind of work will read it as context, not criticism. The /tools/rescue-effort-estimator can help you set expectations before you /post.
Invite the developer as a collaborator on the repository rather than sharing your account. Add them to the hosting provider and database service through team invitations, with the narrowest role that lets them do the job. If any environment values were ever pasted into a chat or committed, rotate them before inviting anyone.
Developers taking over this kind of code may find /guides/first-week-on-an-inherited-codebase helpful. Price, scope and payment are agreed between you and the developer; TakeoverWork introduces people and does not check or employ anyone.
Be the first rescue specialist here
Developers and agencies who finish other people's projects can create a free profile and list this as a specialty.
A calm, day-by-day plan for your first week on someone else's code: secure access, make backups, learn the system, add safety nets, then report in writing.
ReadRead the listing closely, check the repo, run the code, and scope the unknowns before you promise anything. A short paid assessment protects you and the client.
ReadPackage your half-built project so a new developer can run, change and deploy it without guessing: accounts, code, setup, known issues and a clean access plan.
ReadNo. Cursor edits normal files in a normal folder, so any developer can open the repository in the editor they prefer. Rules files in a .cursor folder are harmless to other tools and can even help the next person understand your conventions.
It is a risk. Push it to a private GitHub or GitLab repository before you post, so there is a backup and a history. Check that files with secrets, such as .env, are listed in .gitignore and not committed.
Yes. Projects written with Claude Code, Windsurf, GitHub Copilot or similar assistants have the same character as Cursor projects: real source code that a developer can take over directly.
Run a repository health check and note which features fail. A developer reviewing the code for an hour or two can usually give a much better estimate than the AI that wrote it.
Yes. Many owners keep making small changes themselves. Agree with the developer on branches and pull requests, so your edits and theirs are reviewed before they meet.